Would you rather have an Incident Management system custom-built to your exact specifications, potentially costing more time and resources, or an off-the-shelf solution that's ready to deploy but might not fit all your unique needs?
Decision makers in companies often face this critical decision. And, that’s the debate of the day!
Let’s explore and decode the decision of building vs. buying an Incident Management software. By the end of this blog, you might finally resolve the dilemma and reach a conclusion. Regardless of the outcome, you’ll definitely be wise to know the pros and cons of both your options.
Outages are costly. A whopping 54% of data centers surveyed by Uptime Institute in 2023 reported that their most recent major outage cost them over $100,000, with a staggering 16% exceeding $1 million. No wonder it’s time to prioritize this aspect of your IT operations which, quite frankly if compromised, can have serious consequences on your brand value and customer experience. That’s something no business big or small gambles upon.
Each company has its unique approach to Incident Response and addressing high-priority incidents. While an in-house tool tends to cater to customized processes, a market-sourced Incident Management tool provides standardized workflows and features tailored to optimize Incident Response.
The decision to build versus buy an Incident Management solution can be complex. While building a custom solution might seem like a quicker path initially, it's crucial to consider the long-term implications. Here's a breakdown of the key factors to consider:
Sometimes, budgetary approval might lie outside the DevOps team's control, even though the need for the tool is clear. Building an open-source solution can appear as a faster workaround compared to the potentially lengthy procurement process. However, this is an internal communication and approval issue, not a technical one. Custom solutions often lack long-term support and scalability.
There are legitimate reasons to consider building your own solution, including:
While the upfront cost of a pre-built solution might seem high, it's essential to factor in the long-term costs associated with building your own:
Read More: Incident Response Tools: Key Considerations & Best Practices
Pre-built Incident Management solutions offer several advantages:
One of the biggest weaknesses of building your own Incident Management solution is integration. Successful in-house built Incident Management platforms boast robust integration libraries. These integrations connect your platform to various sources (applications, infrastructure) and distribution channels (collaboration tools). This seamless flow of data facilitates efficient Incident Management.
Building integrations is a resource-intensive endeavor. Developers need to invest significant time learning and coding against new APIs. While a custom solution might only integrate with a select few tools relevant to your current needs, challenges arise when those APIs change:
Open-source projects often lack the resources to keep pace with frequent API updates or develop new integrations. This can lead to:
As your team scales and requirements change, the tools you need to integrate with might evolve as well. Building a custom solution often lacks the flexibility to adapt to these ongoing changes.
Custom Incident Management solutions address these integration challenges by:
By leveraging a pre-built solution, you can avoid the integration burden and focus on what matters most - effectively managing your incidents.
Building a custom Incident Management solution might seem tempting initially, but carefully weigh the long-term implications. Pre-built solutions often offer a more cost-effective and sustainable approach, allowing your team to focus on what matters most - delivering exceptional products and services.
While commercial or pre-built Incident Management solutions offer significant advantages, there are a few niche scenarios where building a custom platform based on open-source projects might be considered:
In rare instances, an organization might require a highly specialized solution for a very specific, niche scenario. These organizations often already have a vendor-provided Incident Management software in place for their broader environment. The custom solution would then serve a focused purpose, potentially integrating with the main platform's API for data exchange.
Read More: Streamline Incident Resolution with Squadcast’s Outgoing Webhooks
Another consideration is for alerting used in contexts outside traditional application or infrastructure support. For example, such alerting might be used for collaboration or product management purposes. Here, it could be beneficial to segment this use case from the mission-critical Incident Management system by creating a more lightweight, custom solution. This approach could be suitable for teams with extensive customization needs around application usage data. Imagine receiving alerts when a newly launched feature is used, or monitoring performance KPIs after new infrastructure is deployed.
Read More: Manage Different Teams Within An Organization With Role Based Access Control
Finally, there might be very specific situations with exceptional data security concerns, both internal and external. These concerns could relate to alerts where remediation might expose personally identifiable information (PII) to internal support personnel who lack the necessary access. This could be a particular concern in highly regulated industries.It's important to note that, in most cases (4 out of 5), these data security concerns can be addressed by adjusting user roles and access permissions within a commercial platform. Therefore, modifying existing solutions should always be the primary approach. However, in those rare instances where it's truly unavoidable, a custom solution might be considered.
While there are a few niche scenarios where a custom Incident Management solution might be tempting, the advantages of commercial platforms are significant. They offer pre-built integrations, ongoing maintenance, and scalability, all while freeing up your internal resources to focus on core business objectives. Carefully evaluate your needs and weigh the long-term implications before starting a custom development project.
Making the decision between building a custom Incident Management solution or leveraging a commercial platform requires a strategic approach. Seasoned IT professionals understand that the initial creation of the solution is just the beginning. The true challenges lie in:
The responsibility doesn't stop at creation. Running a custom Incident Management system adds another layer of complexity:
There are a few scenarios where building a custom solution might be considered:
In most cases, vendor provided Incident Management solutions offer a compelling value proposition by:
Explore More: Guide To Best Incident Management Tools and Software of 2024
Don't miss out on opportunity cost
When evaluating "build vs. buy," carefully consider the opportunity cost. The time and resources dedicated to building and maintaining a custom solution could be better spent on core business initiatives. By focusing on this often-overlooked factor, the decision often becomes clear.
If you already have a tool in place and are often stuck between jumping from alerting to incident response management and back to alerting or ticketing tool, you can even go for migrating to a tool that does both. Here are two resources that can help you with choosing Squadcast:
When evaluating "build vs. buy," consider the following:
In most cases, the benefits and efficiencies offered by commercially available solutions outweigh the challenges and complexities associated with building your own platform. In most cases, the benefits and efficiencies offered by commercially available Incident Management solutions outweigh the challenges and complexities associated with building your own platform.
With all that said, if you want to consult our IT advisors about Squadcast Incident Management solution, you can book a demo here today. 🙂